Monday, April 30, 2012

The Best Show I Never Saw

Chicago, 1990. I read a review of Stumpy's Gang in the Chicago Reader. Stumpy's Gang was a parody of children's puppet shows, set in a genetics laboratory.  Although it is Frank the Janitor's job to pitch the genetic mistakes into the incinerator instead he keeps them as his friends. 

At the age of fifteen, I REALLY wanted to see this show, but I chickened out and didn't make my way through the big, scary city to find it. Every few years or so I search online for some tidbit -- a photo, something. Today, I find a YouTube channel with video of the actual show -- uploaded in 2008 (how have I missed it?!?) It is ... more ... than I imagined:



The show moved to Los Angeles in 1994 where it enjoyed a successful run at the Zephyr. I imagine there are some people on the scene today who saw it back then.

As elated as I was to find these videos online, I am even more distressed that I missed out on this all those many years ago. This show appears to be way ahead of its time. The puppets are incredible.

The lesson here is twofold: First, go see it. If you feel the urge to check something out, don't put it off, don't make excuses for yourself, go. There is no substitute for lost moments or unexperienced experiences. Second, if you make theatre, put your archives online. Please. There is no Academy of Theatrical Arts and Sciences dedicated to the preservation of stage plays, no UCLA Theatre Archives keeping the detritus of past productions in a cold, dry place. We cannot recapture the past, but we can show people what they missed.

Friday, April 27, 2012

The Waxman Letters, #1

My dear nephew Clive,
 
Thank you so much for the generous offer to serve on the board of directors of your exciting new endeavor.  Alas, I am stretched a bit thin between my obligations to a number of other theatre companies around town, so I fear I must decline.  However you know your uncle will always be here with a word of encouragement, to steer you in the right direction as you and your cohorts build what will no doubt become one of the better intimate theatre companies in Los Angeles.

It was right for the group of you to splinter off from that other company.  No one ever solved anything by staying where they are and trying to improve things.  You all no doubt know how to better run a theatre company than that tyrant of an artistic director who has kept a stranglehold on things for the past ten years.  How he manages to hold onto his position year after year is anyone's guess.  Alas, he is a friend, and I remain on his Board of Directors out of a silly sense of obligation.

I am excited to hear you have already decided on a name and are hard at work on a mission statement.  Be thorough, but try to keep it under 200 words.  And remember:  Grantors really care about the way such things are worded.  Keep it specific yet a little vague, focusing on the importance of "storytelling" and "trying new things."  "Edgy" is a good word to use, as funders like to believe they are on the cutting edge of an artform as old as time.  They also like to see a committment to "collaboration" and "community".  These are largely empty words, but everyone uses them. 

Don't worry if what you come up with seems like a carbon copy of a carbon copy.  It is far more important that you outline your mission without baring your teeth, so to speak.  You can express who you truly are onstage.  The mission statement is simply supposed to make you look professional, and so it will invariably seem a little too like the mission statements of other theatre companies.  Again, this is wholly acceptable.  It makes your new company consistent with all those other, more established companies, i.e. "professional."
 
I trust you are also wildly patching together your first season.  I hope you will think to include a Shakespeare for your old uncle.

Kindest personal regards,

Mort Waxman

Thursday, April 26, 2012

Festive Crack-Ups!


Well, we're doing it again.  Some thoughts:
  • The variety show format is very much alive and well in Los Angeles!  There are a number of shows out there spreading the love, and I hope to spotlight them in the coming weeks.  It's a great format.  First, this town is chock-a-block with variety artists of all stripes:  magicians, burlesquers, contortionists, jugglers--the list is endless.  That's part of the reason why Mr. Snapper & Mr. Buddy are so cavalier about booking a "Craigslist Wildcard" sight unseen.  We know that we will draw talent.  Second, the risk the audience takes in attending a variety show is pretty small.  Even if there are one or two bum acts on the bill (and there rarely are!) it's over quick and you're onto the next act.  Finally, a smart producer can do some really fun stuff with framing the evening.  I like what Bella Luna is doing at Red Light Revue with her continuing storyline.
  • The artists Phillip and I ask to join us are game.  Our process is very improvisational at the beginning and so we cannot put a show together without active involvement from everyone.  At the beginning of the first rehearsal for each show I'm nervous that our guest artists are going to walk out, convinced of our unprofessionalism.  Invariably, they jump into it with us, and help us craft a show that is way better than I could imagine at the outset. 
  • Always be on the lookout for something awesome.  Phillip discovered FanFueled recently, and we're using them as our online ticketer.  They have a bunch of bells and whistles we're looking forward to exploring, including a neat little incentive for ticket buyers to promote your show.  Go check them out.
  • We are having fun with our promotional efforts, and I believe it is accurately capturing the madcap fun we have with the show itself.  The "Press Releases and Branding" class I attended with New York's Mayor of Burlesque, Jonny Porkpie has altered the way I view such things.  Read the press release below and see if you don't agree:  We're having fun.   
Our quarterly excursion into insanity (or rather, our quarterly presentation of how insane Phil and I truly are) is happening this coming Sunday night!  We handcraft each show for our audience, and we would be thrilled if you'd join us.

Press release follows:

RUMPUS REVUE RESCHEDULED - RELIEVED REPORTERS RECEIVE RELEASE
Local Neo-Vaudevillians Postpone Blockbuster Show in order to Release Press Release
HOLLYWOOD -- Regional celebrities Mr. Snapper and Mr. Buddy (they originate from a very small region) proudly and brazenly announce the rescheduling of their next variety showcase, THE MR. SNAPPER AND MR. BUDDY RUMPUS REVUE IN: "FESTIVE CRACK-UPS". This paganesque cacophony of sight, sound, and half-naked women was previously scheduled for April 15th, but will now be found thrilling audiences at the historic Theatre Asylum on April 29th, mere blocks from where Buster Keaton’s movie studio once stood!
"The time is ripe to really shake things up in Hollywood," said Mr. Snapper, balancing a piano bench on his chin. "This is a jaded town; a cynical town. You have to give the suckers something they've never seen before. So we are rescheduling our show. Bam! Suck on that, Hollywood!" Mr. Buddy, his silent partner, looks up from his hookah and nods in blissful, unknowing agreement. His hookah smoke smells of cinnamon and hashish. Mr. Buddy blows a series of oddly shaped smoke signals and passes out. Mr. Snapper interprets, "Ah. Also, we forgot to put out a press release the first time. Our mistake." At this point in the interview, the piano bench falls violently to Mr. Snapper's face, knocking him to the ground. "One more thing," Snapper struggles to say as blood pools on the floor, "it's BYOB."
Mr. Snapper and Mr.Buddy invite you to resurrect frivolity and join them for an evening of song, variety, half-naked women and hubba hubba! Snapper, a ukulele playing songster, and his silent foil, Buddy, are your hosts, making a barely capable attempt at maintaining order as the libidinous passions of a group of ragtag performers rage wildly out of control! Jacob Smith returns as the irrepressible Pistachio the Mime. Burlesque from Red Snapper, the balloon art shenanigans of Rob the Balloon Guy, the musical magic of Elizabeth Luttinger, and the trombone musings of Sean Pawling round out the evening. There will also be special appearances by the Los Angeles Light Orchestra and the Craigslist Wildcard (literally whatever variety act answers the ad on Craigslist first). ONE PERFORMANCE ONLY, April 29th at 8:30 pm at Theatre Asylum in Hollywood. Tickets are $12 at the door, or $10 if purchased in advance online at tickets.snapperbuddy.com. Visit www.snapperbuddy.com for more information.

Wednesday, April 25, 2012

Jennie Webb Shows Great Judgement and Does Us All a Favor

"Jennie Webb Blogs Against Her Better Judgment About LA Theater" -- "Against her better judgement"?  Please.  This is a thoughtful survey of some great theatre companies in the LA area, from a playwright's perspective:
So here goes: my very non-expert and way subjective (and geographically biased; I’m in Eagle Rock) run down of intimate theaters (we don’t say 99-seat anymore) who do new work from one playwright’s perspective – a woman playwright who’d like to see more women playwrights LA stages (can’t we do better than 20%?).
"Non-expert"?  Such modesty.  For anyone hoping to see their work onstage in LA, this is THE article for you.  These are the theatre companies to watch, the bar-setters, and the companies who are actually debuting awesome, original plays.  Go see their productions, o ye burgeoning playwrights of the City of Angels.  Take notes.  Meet people.  Get inspired.  Write.

Tuesday, April 24, 2012

Don't Fence Me In

Can't look at hobbles
And I can't stand fences
Don't fence me in.
-- "Don't Fence Me In," Cole Porter and Robert Fletcher
I am in awe of Rebecca Novick.

The Bay area director and dramaturg has knocked one out of the park with her article at Grantmakers in the Arts entitled "Please, Don't Start a Theatre Company!"  She beautifully describes the problems facing theatre makers as they enter the market before outlining solutions that are nothing short of genius (and not just because I agree 100% with them.)
We should encourage apprentice artists to self-produce work, or band together and produce each other's work. We should not demand that they cloak that straightforward practice in the trappings of a made-up company simply to attract funding or press notice. Moreover, we should encourage artists to operate like bands do — coming together to play a few gigs, then dissolving as people's interests diverge, perhaps performing regularly with a few different groups and experimenting with different styles and genres. Forming a permanent company at this stage is a bit like getting married too young, before you've had the chance to discover your own identity or what you're really looking for in a collaborator.
Good God, what are you still doing on Mad Theatrics?  Click through and read Novick's entire article.
 
The idea encapsulated in the quote above is something I've blogged about before.  The Autonym thought experiment was an attempt to suss out this kind of approach.  The above is also perfectly in line with the idea of small theatre as an extension of the bardic tradition.  Novick is far more eloquent than I, and she goes much farther in describing the role funders may play in the changes she proposes.
 
There is another quote that really jumped out at me, the words of MAP Fund program director, Moira Brennan: “Why build a building and such heavyweight infrastructure for this thing [theater] that is both underfunded and ephemeral? This just doesn't make much sense.”  Why indeed?
 
When you are producing theatre on the margins, the lighter you are the better.  Small theatre can zoom like the motorcyclists that split lanes and weave through traffic on our jam-packed highways.  You can respond to emerging events in your community.  You can artfully engage with the audience in a way that shapes a production.  You can be vital, God damn it!
 
In short, if you are a small theatre company, you have the option of roaming free.  Why would you hobble yourself?  Why would you fence yourself in?  The world we should be exploring is out there, not in a board of directors meeting or a committee assignment.  Make theatre, not bureaucracy!

Tuesday, April 17, 2012

The Elephant Man

presented by The Mechanicals Theatre Group at Pico Playhouse
review by Andrew Moore
  
Left to right: Daniel Jimenez, Mouchette van Helsdingen, Rachael Meyers, Bonnie Kathleen Ryan, Cynthia Beckert, Richard Gilbert-Hill, John Newman, Michael Matthys

[Disclaimer:  I am friends with Cynthia Beckert, and we perform together on the burlesque stage.  I took this assignment knowing that I could give a fair appraisal of her performance.  She would expect nothing less from me.]

The Elephant Man is not really about John Merrick.  It's about yearning, desperation, "normalcy," repression, illusion, mercy, and human connection.  It is about what truly motivates charity:  Pretension or philanthropy?  Posturing or altruism?  And finally, it is about two very different men who cling to their illusions, and who fall apart when their illusions end.  It is remarkable how stirringly Bernard Pomerance's 1979 play speaks to the world of 2012.  The Mechanicals selected this play as part of a season that promises "outside the box" interpretations of modern classics.  There is no doubt that The Elephant Man is a modern classic, and that the Mechanicals have achieved their aim with this production.

The Mechanicals thrust us immediately into the world of the play.  As the audience enters, the cast is already assembled onstage, knitting, reading, playing solitaire -- each player occupied in his or her own place on Wan Chih Haley Ho's set.  Ho has conjured a delicious environment, earthy and worn; a rich decoupage of antiques, exposed lighting and grime.  The depth of space is phenomenal, lit beautifully by Hilda Kane, and managed with ease by Director Neil Patrick Stewart.

Stewart understands theatrical mise-en-scène. We joke sometimes about how theatre is "in lifelike 3-D," but few directors actually seem to take advantage of all axes of physical stage space.  There is a dimensionality to Stewart's direction from which some other intimate theatre directors could take a lesson. In addition to the mastery of his space, Stewart has created a fertile environment for his actors, either giving them permission to dig deep into the script or else prodding them to do so.  With an ensemble like this, it is difficult to tell where the director ends and the actors begin.

Left to right: Rachael Meyers, John Newman, Bonnie Kathleen Ryan, Michael Matthys

John Newman sublimely expresses emotion beneath the emotionless mask of John Merrick.  The parroting of other characters is done in a mocking sort of way, revealing Merrick's cunning intelligence.  Newman's physicality is just enough, as it meets the audience halfway.  The playwright recommends against realistic make-up for this role, a poignantly powerful choice.  The audience is forced to confront the man while simultaneously "creating" the deformity in their imaginations.

Cynthia Beckert is simply wonderful as the actress, Mrs. Kendal.  One moment sums it up:  Before meeting Merrick for the first time, Mrs. Kendal rehearses her goodbye.  "It has been my great pleasure to make your acquaintance, Mr. Merrick," or some such banality, repeated until she has the inflection just right.  Then she meets Merrick, and is moved by his wit and insight.  At the end of the visit, the moment happens.  She extends her hand -- Treves prompts Merrick to take her hand and shake it -- and she says her goodbye.  As I recall, it is word for word what she rehearsed with Treves, but gone is the actorly inflection, replaced by a genuine sincerity that stops time.

Michael Matthys turns in a deeply moving performance as Freddie Treves, the physician who "rescues" Merrick from the sideshow.  Matthys sneaks up on us.  The evolution of Treves from a buttoned down, conservative Brit to a thoroughly disillusioned and dismayed man on the verge of breakdown happens so naturally, so delicately, that by the time he is at wit's end, we are right there with him.  He makes a strong choice -- completely backed up by the text -- and breaks our hearts.

The ensemble in general delivers thoughtful, committed performances.  I wish I could have observed their process, because the care with which each choice has been made implies a considerable amount of time spent tearing apart Pomerance's words, sucking the marrow from the text, and dutifully crafting their roles with the same care the playwright took in crafting this elegant play. 

Some issues:  The depiction of the Pinheads is a little problematic.  It is not clear exactly who or what they are, in part because they are given a more presentational treatment than the rest of the characters.  (After Merrick begins speaking to them, this issue becomes almost entirely moot, as he feeds the audience the information we need to understand what is going on.)

There are some sight line issues with the projections.  Although this is not the end of the world with the transitional slides at the top of each scene, the projections are absolutely vital when Treves presents Merrick in his scene 3 lecture.  This is the only time the audience will see what the real Merrick looked like, which feeds our imaginations and how we perceive him for the rest of the play. 

Finally, there were two performers who remained upstage: one who wrote words on the upstage wall, and the other who sat upstage left in sunglasses and headphones.  I call them performers, but they were more like living scenery, and no indication or explanation of their purpose could be discerned.  Granted, they added considerable atmosphere to the play, but on balance they seemed to exist as a directorial whim; a theatrical affectation.  I'm not saying lose them, I'm saying throw us something, at least performer bios in the program with trumped up "character" names.  "The Scribe" and "The Anchor".  I don't know -- something.

Unless, of course, wondering about them is the point!  In which case I'd say kudos.  I am baffled by their inclusion, but I cannot imagine the play without them.

At any rate, these minor points don't detract from a production that is elegant, moving and immediate.

The Elephant Man is on display for all to see Fridays and Saturdays at 8:00 pm; Sundays at 7:00 pm through May 15th.  Pico Playhouse is located at 10508 W Pico Blvd., Los Angeles, CA 90064 (a bit north of the 10.  Overland Avenue is the nearest cross street, to the west of Pico Playhouse.)

Tickets are $15 at www.mechanicalstheatregroup.com or $20 at the door.  Street parking is available, but get there a little early to ensure you find a spot.  The Mechanicals run a tight ship, and they do start on time.  You will not want to miss a moment.

Monday, April 16, 2012

Reviewers Wanted

Mad Theatrics needs reviewers. Our approach is simple: Theatre artists reviewing theatre artists with a focus on specific, constructive, and honest critiques that aim to improve the overall quality of Los Angeles theatre. No snark, and we leave our prejudices and preconceptions at the door. Think of it as giving notes to a fellow artist -- because that's the majority of who actually reads reviews.  

Interested? Email me. We'll talk.

Remembering Werner and Bob

One of the beautiful things about theater is the relationships you form.  In some cases, those relationships last a lifetime. I'm marrie...